Boris Charmatz
Choreographer · Co-Curator
In 2016, dancer and choreographer Boris Charmatz was invited to Philadelphia for Westphal College’s Dancing Dialogues residency, which featured the acclaimed Levée des conflits for 24 dancers. He choreographed manger, which will be presented by FringeArts September 22-23, 2018, and danse de nuit, which will be the final performance of the Philadelphia Museum of Dance daylong dance exhibit at the Barnes Foundation on October 6, 2018.
Charmatz has presented a series of highly memorable pieces, from Aatt enen tionon (1996) to 10000 gestures (2017). While maintaining an extensive touring schedule, he also participates in improvisational events on a regular basis with Saul Williams, Archie Shepp, and Médéric Collignon and continues to work as a performer with Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker and Tino Sehgal.
As associate artist of the 2011 Festival d'Avignon, Charmatz presented enfant, a piece for 26 children and 9 dancers in the Cour d’Honneur of the Pope’s Palace. In 2013, he was invited to MoMA, New York, where he conceived Musée de la danse: Three Collective Gestures, a three week dance program in the Marron Atrium and all over the museum. In 2015, Charmatz was invited to Tate Modern, London for If Tate Modern was Musée de la danse?, an intensive two day performance program throughout the galleries and the Turbine Hall.
From 2002-2004, while an artist-in-residence at the Centre National de la Danse, he developed Bocal, a nomadic and ephemeral school that brought together students from different backgrounds. In 2007 and 2008, he was a visiting professor at Berlin’s Universität der Künste, where he contributed to the creation of a new dance curriculum.
Since 2009, he has been the director of the Rennes and Brittany National Choreographic Centre (France), and has transformed it into a Museum of Dance (Musée de la danse) of a new kind. The museum has initiated, among others, the projects: préfiguration, expo zéro, rebutoh, brouillon (rough draft), 20 Dancers for the XX Century, Fous de danse (Mad about dance), and Petit Musée de la danse.
Charmatz co-authored the books undertraining / On A Contemporary Dance with Isabelle Launay, Emails 2009-2010 with Jérôme Bel, and wrote “Je suis une école,” related to the project Bocal. More information is available at museedeladanse.org and borischarmatz.org
Excerpts from the Manifesto for a Dancing Museum
It seems to me that the designation “Museum, Dancing Museum” could function like a door flung wide open to culture and the art of dancing that we will not change into a sanctuary.
(...) Dance and its actors are often defined in opposition to the arts that are said to be perennial, lasting, static, for which the museum would be the favourite place. But today if one wants to stop obscuring the historical space, culture and choreographic heritage, even the most contemporary, then it is time to see, to make visible and bring alive the moving bodies of a culture which largely remains to be invented. And if one wishes the choreographic tradition to pursue the new technological trends and truly embrace the trans-media space of the contemporary world, then it seems to me that under the designation of “Museum” the artists will be able to have fun and create freely.
To not cut the matter short, ten commandments:
a micro-museum
but a real one. It fully embraces its museum tasks and maintains a balance between its various functions of
conservation, creation, research, exhibition, diffusion, raising of public awareness, mediation, without
neglecting any of them. Such interdependence is what justifies the creation of a museal structure.
a museum of artists
researchers, collectors, curators, exhibition commissioners participate in the life of the museum, but above
all it is essentially artists who invent it by creating works. It is therefore an artistic project initiated
by Boris Charmatz, but produced by numerous artists.
an eccentric museum
it intends to be an introduction, an appetizer, a place for enhancing public awareness of dance and
choreographic culture in the broadest sense, of the history of the body and its representations. However,
it is not centred exclusively on choreographic art: it does not seek to establish a taxonomy of dance, its goal
is not to offer a settled definition of the subject. Its ideal isn’t to give an exhaustive representation either
of the different dances performed around the world. It wishes to stimulate the desire for knowledge.
an incorporated museum
it can only develop provided that it is built by the bodies moving through it, those of the public, the artists,
but also of the museum employees (attendants, technicians, admin staff, etc.), who bring the works to life,
even becoming actors themselves.
a provocative museum
it approaches dance and its history through a resolutely contemporary vision. It spends time questioning the
ingenuous knowledge everyone has about dancing. It induces unlikely links, confrontations between worlds
usually poles apart from one another. It questions the accepted conventions that circulate about dance... and
therefore elsewhere in society.
a transgressive museum
it fully acknowledges the fact that its activity does not limit itself to the quest for and the representation
of the “authentic” object; it encourages artists and visitors to make works their own, it stimulates plagiarism.
Artistic creation and the visitor’s experience are at the core of its action. Being a place of life, a social
space for controversy, a place for talking and interpretation, it is not only a space for accumulation
and representation.
a permeable museum
it defends the principle according to which an openness to a broader concept of dance means allowing other movements
to influence us, to leave behind a fixed identity. To open up to difference.
a museum of complex temporalities
it deals with both the ephemeral and the perennial, the experimental and the patrimonial. Active, reactive, mobile,
it is a viral museum which can be grafted onto other places, can spread dance in places where it was not expected.
It is also a museum with a programme evolving with the rhythm of seasons, able to relocate to beaches in the summer
period or to propose a winter University…
a cooperative museum
it is independent, but works in connection with a network of partners, cooperates with institutions linked to dance
(contemporary, classic and traditional, scholarly and popular), to museums, to art centres and galleries, to
research centres and universities, and it in no way sets itself against them. It builds deep relationships with
individuals, whether they be artists of international fame like Mikhail Baryshnikov, Steve Paxton, William Forsythe,
or passionate amateurs.
an immediate museum
it exists as soon as the first gesture has been performed.
— Boris Charmatz
Photo © Caroline Ablain